The Stroop Test Applications Within Cognitive Psychology

The Stroop Test Applications Within Cognitive Psychology

Introduction

The Stroop test is designed to diagnose the cognitive style of flexibility and rigidity of cognitive control. This cognitive style characterizes the degree of subjective difficulty in changing ways of processing information in a situation of cognitive conflict (Houdé, 2019). Rigid control indicates difficulties in the transition from verbal to sensory-perceptual functions due to the low degree of their automation. In contrast, flexible control indicates the relative ease of such a transition. The Stroop test is widely used in cognitive psychology precisely to reveal the degree of automation of transition from verbal to sensory-perceptual functions.

In its classic version, the test includes three stimulus cards. They include a map of words printed in black ink, a map of colors, and a map of words printed in a font mismatched with the meanings of the colors (Taylor & Workman, 2021). Five colors and words were used: red, blue, green, brown, and purple. The words and colors on the white cards were represented as a matrix consisting of ten rows and ten columns. Each of the five colors occurred twice in each row and column, but they were not repeated in a row and did not form any regular sequences. Words with mismatched meanings were printed the same number of times in each of the other four colors. For example, the word “red” was printed the same number of times in blue, green, brown, and purple. According to this stimulus material, the subjects were offered the following tasks. The first is reading the names of the colors printed in black type and naming the colors.

Another option is to read color names where the color of the font is different from the meaning of the word. Instruction to the test person is to call aloud the colors of the font or to read the words on the map line by line from left to right quickly and without error. If an error occurs, the test person must correct it independently. The average time for the group of examinees to play aloud all the stimuli on the map is an indicator of the effectiveness of the task. The rigidity or flexibility of the control index is calculated as the difference in time to complete the third (colored words) and the second (color) card. The greater this difference is, the greater the interference effect and, accordingly, the more pronounced the rigidity of cognitive control (Spieler & Schumacher, 2019). Interference, in this case, is the result of a conflict of verbal and sensory-perceptual functions. The test subject must ignore the meaning of the word and name the color he or she sees.

Low interference indicates the ability to inhibit inherently more vital verbal functions for the sake of color perception. High indicates that the test subject has difficulty releasing himself from the influence of the word’s meaning when it does not correspond to the visual impression. The Stroop method allows for an additional index of verbality (Scharfen et al., 2018). This is defined as the ratio of time spent on the second (color) card to the first (words) card. High values of this parameter indicate a prevalence of the verbal method of information processing, and low values indicate a prevalence of the sensory-perceptual. The interference index is interpreted as a measure of the automation of cognitive functions, that is, the degree of their independent functioning. Thus, one pole of this cognitive style characterizes flexible control and strong automation of cognitive functions, and the other pole characterizes rigid control and weak automation of cognitive functions.

Various modifications of the Stroop test are also used in cognitive psychology. For example, American psychologist Louis Thurstone used only four colors, black background cards, and circles instead of squares on color cards to study perception (Roy et al., 2018). Arthur Jensen proposed another variation; he arranged the stimuli on the cards in random order, avoiding repetition. Despite the different modifications, they all had the same goal: to determine the flexibility of cognitive thinking (Chen et al., 2019). Among other things, the Stroop test indicates an individual’s ability to focus and concentrate at that moment. High levels of stress, the presence of any unresolved problems, and pronounced sleepiness interfere with the test. However, if a person does not have such indicators and still has difficulty taking the test, he or she should pay attention to concentration problems.

Strength and Limitations of the Stroop Test

Like any other psychological test, the Stroop task has its strengths and limitations. The primary strength of the Stroop test is its wide range of possibilities and applications. It can be considered one of the few universal psychological tests aimed a